- Forum
- Götter, Wesen, Ahnen
- Götter, Ahnen, Naturgeister und andere Wesen.....
- Naturgeister und andere Wesen
- Otherkin? Therians?
Otherkin? Therians?
- Lady of Darkness
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Beiträge: 1232
- Dank erhalten: 2
(Es klingt vielleicht ein wenig gemein, aber bei vielen ähnlichen Themen habe ich das Gefühl, dass die "Betroffenen" eigentlich einen Weg suchen, sich selber aufzuwerten, indem sie erklären, sie seien etwas anderes/besseres(?) als ihre Mitmenschen. Ich denke da an Indigo- und Kristallkinder, inkarnierte Elfen und Feen, Druiden, Kleopatras, Götter und Göttinnen ... - kein Scherz, alles schon erlebt.)
Remember that you're perfect - the gods make no mistakes...
diandrasgeschichtenquelle.org
knusperhaus.wordpress.com
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Therianthropy is a generic term for any transformation of a human into another animal form, or for a being which displays both human and animal characteristics, either as a part of mythology or as a spiritual concept. The word is derived from Greek therion (Θηριον), meaning "wild animal" or "beast", and anthrōpos (ανθρωπος), meaning "man".
(Wikipedia)
www.vampyres.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=207
Der Begriff Reinkarnation /ˌreːɪnkarnaˈtsɪ̯oːn/ (lateinisch Wiederfleischwerdung) bezeichnet die Idee, dass die menschliche Seele nach dem Tod (Exkarnation) auf dieser Erde oder anderen Existenzbereichen wieder als empfindendes Wesen geboren (inkarniert) wird. Dieses Konzept wird auch als Wiedergeburt, Seelenwanderung, Transmigration oder Metempsychose bezeichnet. Die außerkörperliche Erfahrung steht in engem Zusammenhang mit dem Begriff Reinkarnation. In einigen, aber keineswegs allen Reinkarnationslehren steht auch der Begriff des Karma damit in einem engen Zusammenhang.
Nach hinduistischer Vorstellung ist der Mensch eine unsterbliche Seele (Atman), die sich nach dem Tode des Körpers in einem neu in Erscheinung tretenden Wesen – dies können auch Tiere sein – wieder verkörpert. Die Qualität der Wiedergeburt oder Seelenwanderung ist abhängig von den in der/den Vorexistenz/en gewirkten Taten (Karma). »Wie einer handelt, wie einer wandelt, ein solcher wird er. Aus guter Handlung entsteht Gutes, aus schlechter Handlung entsteht Schlechtes«, lehren die Upanishaden. Karma (die Tat) ist verknüpft mit der Vorstellung an eine sittliche Weltordnung (Dharma), wodurch alle Handlungen gemäß dem Prinzip von Ursache und Wirkung die Voraussetzung für die künftige Wiedergeburt darstellen. Ein jedes Wesen besteht aufgrund seines in früheren Daseinsformen angesammelten Tatenpotenzials, welches also das Gesamtergebnis einer jeden Existenz bewirkt. Folglich ist der Tod nicht der Abschluss des Lebens, sondern lediglich der Übergang zu einer neuen Daseinsform. Erhalten bleibt der durch den Atman (ewige Seele) begründete, ewige und unveränderliche Wesenskern des Menschen. Der Jiva - das ist der Atman (ewige Seele) zusammen mit Vernunft, Gefühlen und Wünschen, der sich stets aufs neue manifestiert.
Vor allem in der Frage der Reinkarnation geht der Buddhismus grundlegend andere Wege als der Hinduismus. In Ablehnung einer geschaffenen, individuellen Seele kennt der Buddhismus keinen Übergang einer seelischen Substanz von der einen auf die andere Existenz, keine Transmigration, keine Wanderung der Seele. Wiedergeburt wird verstanden als eine Kontinuität der Geistesprozesse, als Fortsetzung der beim Ableben eines Individuums noch nicht erloschenen mentalen Kräfte, die sich in einer neu in Erscheinung tretenden Existenz aufs Neue reaktualisieren.
Die Ursache der Wiedergeburt liegt im Begehren nach Sinnesbefriedigung, im Trieb nach Sein und Verwirklichung. Wiederwerden ist also solange gegeben, wie verursachende, nach Realisierung drängende Triebkräfte vorhanden sind. Da dieses Begehren im Buddhismus gleichgesetzt wird mit Leiden, versucht man, diesen leidvollen Daseinskreislauf (samsâra) zu durchbrechen. Dazu führt der "achtfache Pfad". Ziel ist der Zustand des Nirvana, das Ende allen Leidens und der Abschluss der Wiedergeburten.
Im tibetischen Buddhismus wiederum hat sich die Tradition der bewußten Wiedergeburt entwickelt. Hier wird einige Jahre nach dem Tod eines Geistlichen mit einer Reihe von tantrischen Praktiken nach dem Kind gesucht, in dem dieser sich reinkarniert haben soll. Der momentane Dalai Lama wird als seine vierzehnte Wiedergeburt betrachtet.
Die am Anfang der klassischen Antike stehenden, um 800 v. Chr. verfassten Epen von Homer -- die Ilias und die Odyssee -- kennen noch keine Reinkarnationslehre. Bekannte Vertreter der Reinkarnationstheorie innerhalb der griechischen Philosophie waren Pythagoras (um 600 v.Chr.), Empedokles und Platon (beide 5. Jh. v.Chr.). Sie alle lehrten, dass die unsterbliche Seele sich reinkarnieren müsse, sei es aufgrund einer inneren Notwendigkeit oder zum Zwecke ihrer moralischen Läuterung in einer neuen Daseinsform, die auch die Tierwelt oder die Pflanzenwelt umfasst. Bei Platon spielte jedoch nur das moralische Kriterium eine Rolle. Seiner Auffassung nach wird man allein aufgrund früheren Verhaltens wiedergeboren.
Innerhalb des Islam bildet die Reinkarnationslehre allein bei der kleinen Minderheit der Drusen eine zentrale Rolle. Wegen ihrer sehr speziellen Lehren ist es jedoch umstritten, ob sie überhaupt noch als Muslime angesehen werden können. Nach der Lehre der Drusen gibt es eine Reinkarnation von Menschen nur wiederum als Menschen, nicht als Tiere.
Die Anthroposophie Rudolf Steiners erhebt den Anspruch, im Ganzen ihrer angeblich wissenschaftlichen Erforschung geistiger Dinge, in die sie Lehren unterschiedlicher Religionen einzubinden strebt, auch die Wiedergeburt untersuchen zu können. Steiner erläutert unzählige Male Anfang und Ende der Inkarnationsreihen, Auswirkungen früherer und Vorbereitungen späterer Leben in einem gerade laufenden, Ähnlichkeiten im Äußeren des Menschen durch mehrere Inkarnationen hindurch, die Kombination des von den Eltern Ererbten mit eigenen inneren Formungskräften ("Wesensgliedern") und die Zustände, in denen sich die Seele zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt befinde und gibt sogar konkrete Angaben dazu, wer als wer wiedergeboren worden sein soll, wobei sich vor allem eine Bewegung vom arabischen Kulturkreis in den europäischen herauskristallisiert.
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinkarnation
Otherkin bezeichnet in der Esoterik eine Person, die behauptet, dass sie in einem früheren, parallelen oder sonstigen Dasein ein Leben als ein anderes intelligentes Wesen anders als ein Mensch gelebt hat, z. B. Fee, Dämon, Drache, Nixe, Kobold, etc. und/oder die Seele dieses Wesens besitzt. Ähnlich wie Transgender fühlen sie sich in ihren (menschlichen) Körpern nicht "daheim". Von der Außenwelt i.A. nicht ernstgenommen, finden sich Betroffene gerne in Internetforen zusammen.
--> So, jetzt bin ich komplett verwirrt. Hab mal ein paar Reinkarnationstheorien rausgesucht, sowie die Definitionen von Theriantrophie und Otherkin.
Die vorherrschende Meinung im www scheint also zu sein, dass sich Menschen-, Tier-, und sonstige Seelen voneinander unterscheiden. Und dass beim Otherkin bzw. Therian der Mensch Mensch ist, aber zusätzlich noch die/eine Seele eines Tieres (Therian) oder sonstigen Wesens (Otherkin) in sich trägt. Was auch immer sie damit machen, wie auch immer sie damit kommunizieren, wer über wen herrscht, das sei dahingestellt. das www bietet da unzählige Informationquellen. :mrgreen:
In den Reinkarnationtheorien wird gesagt, dass die Menschenseele verschiedene Daseinsformen annimmt, um sich weiter zu entwickeln. (richtiges deutsch?) Aber die menschliche Seele bleibt wohl immer eine menschliche Seele. Auch ist es von Religion zu Religion verschieden. In manchen Religionen ist es möglich, dass der Mensch als Tier oder Pflanze reinkarniert in anderen Religionen scheint dies unmöglich zu sein.
@ eald
Du hast sicherlich mit einigen Deiner Theorien recht gehabt.
Liebe Grüße vom Engelchen :angel2:
[schild=1 fontcolor=000000 shadowcolor=C0C0C0 shieldshadow=1]End offtopic[/schild]
Dein Herz ist frei... habe den Mut ihm zu folgen
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Du hast sicherlich mit einigen Deiner Theorien recht gehabt.



Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Wenn man eine Person so bezeichnet, die behauptet so zu sein, wie nennt man dann eine Person, die wirklich so ist ??Otherkin bezeichnet in der Esoterik eine Person, die behauptet, dass sie in einem früheren, parallelen oder sonstigen Dasein ein Leben als ein anderes intelligentes Wesen anders als ein Mensch gelebt hat, z. B. Fee, Dämon, Drache, Nixe, Kobold, etc. und/oder die Seele dieses Wesens besitzt.
verwirrt Baldur

- Du kannst mir keine Angst machen, ich habe Kinder -
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Das hängt davon ab, ob sie behauptet, so zu sein. :mrgreen:
Ialokin
Die Liebe zu schenken, den Zauber zu wecken, das Leben zu feiern - das ist unser Sinn.
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Danke und gern geschehen. :mrgreen: Ich weiß es immer gerne ganz genau, wobei das Thema ja etwas schwammig ist, um es genau zu wissen. Schön, dass Du damit was anfangen kannst.

@ Baldur:
a) ist die Definition von Wikipedia :google:
b) Vielleicht hat die eine Person dann damit Recht, also Otherkin zu sein und die andere Unrecht, weil sie es nur behauptet? Das herauszufinden ist jetzt die Frage, wie. :magier: Vielleicht auspendeln?

Liebe Grüße, macht Spaß mit euch. :mrgreen:
Dein Herz ist frei... habe den Mut ihm zu folgen
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
:dragon28:
- Du kannst mir keine Angst machen, ich habe Kinder -
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Hihi gute Idee. :mrgreen:
Dein Herz ist frei... habe den Mut ihm zu folgen
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Hab das Thema mit in Tiere verwandeln und Projizieren mal zum Schamanismus verschoben, weil es teilweise zu einer der Definitionen der Schamanen gehört oder häufiger bei Schamanischen Techniken auftaucht.

Zum Topic Otherkings habe ich noch etwas auf Witchvox gefunden, allerdings auf Englisch:
Quelle: www.witchvox.com/va/dt_va.html?a=uswa&c=words&id=10338he Reincarnation Theory Of Otherkin
Author: Lupa
Posted: December 4th. 2005
Times Viewed: 3,297
Otherkin are a pretty controversial group of people, even within the relatively tolerant realms of NeoPaganism. While we live within the same world as everyone else, working and/or going to school, building and maintaining a variety of relationships, paying the bills, and otherwise leading completely mundane existences, we have other aspects to our personal realities that aren’t quite so everyday. We know/believe that there’s something not quite human about us and we can spend this entire lifetime figuring out just who we’ve been and who we are now.
Some identify as nonhuman, relatively humanoid species such as elves and faeries; others believe there is something of the dragon, gryphon or sea serpent about them; and still others identify strongly with animals native to this plane, well beyond the totemic bond. Yes, it can be a bit of a brain-breaker to try to resolve the conflict between what’s commonly divided into “fantasy” and “reality.” That’s why most `kin spend time trying to figure out just why it is we feel that we’re different in a such a….er…different manner.
One of the most common explanations for being Otherkin is reincarnation. This necessitates a belief in a soul, of course, and the belief that the soul is not species-specific. While some people say that once a(n) (insert species here), always a(n) (insert species here), others maintain that the soul is itself neutral and can be incarnated into any body possible.
Neutral as the soul may be, it still tends to carry material with it from life to life, depending on how strongly the experiences of each life imprinted on it. Some souls are better at keeping their egos intact through each death-birth process than others; this is perhaps why some people have thorough recollections of their previous existences while others have just a few tidbits here and there. It just so happens that for a few people the memories that imprint strongly don’t come from this particular Earth-reality.
It’s debatable whether these lives occurred on alternate Earths or physically different planets entirely. Some Otherkin seem to have a really good idea of where they come from, even being able to pinpoint galaxies or individual stars that correlate to our Sol. I’ve also heard people claim the idea that our world and numerous others inhabit the same basic place, but are layered according to energy resonance (think physical vs. astral plane).
It’d be easy to accuse Otherkin of simply being entirely too imaginative. After all, aren’t elves and such meant to be in the realms of fantasy fiction or, at best, the spirit plane? This is where belief comes into play. Even the most solid cases of reincarnation can’t be thoroughly proven, and sometimes we do have to go on faith to an extent. Consistency seems to be the key to a more likely story. Repeated past life regressions that continually bring up the same people, places, themes and identities are a lot easier to argue for than a single wishful thought that the bearer is afraid to test for fear of being wrong. Some Otherkin, particularly among elves, report shared memories with others, including incidents where the two (or more) parties had not previously communicated with each other on the subject.
The truly skeptical can argue against this all day long—what if one or more people were just saying “Yeah, I remember that,” to go along with the crowd? What if it’s a group delusion? What if? What if?
It’s important to stringently question ourselves and not blindly accept whatever comes our way that looks pretty. Yet if we chase away belief entirely we shut ourselves off from a lot of potentially positive developments in our lives. After all, belief is the basis of spirituality and magic, and Gods know that enough Pagans, Otherkin and otherwise, desire or even need these things in our lives. So while we’ll acknowledge the words of the skeptics and keep close watch on ourselves to make sure we don’t convince ourselves that pixie ‘kin really can fly, we will allow ourselves some belief to explore our possible pasts.
As to why we ended up here, there are a number of possibilities:
Because we needed to learn something about being human. Many reincarnationists believe that we enter into the lives that we do in order to learn a specific lesson. There are quite possibly lessons that only the unique experience of being human can teach. Perhaps some `kin are here to better understand humanity so that they can therefore adopt certain human behaviors. Maybe Earth today has a balance of creation and destruction, Nature and technology, that is unique in the Multiverse. Perhaps some of us came here from someplace better as punishment/rehabilitation for some wrongdoing; or maybe from somewhere worse so we can get a breather (after all, this place certainly isn’t all bad!) Just as a soul may be born as a cougar to learn to be more aggressive or a way to learn patience, the experience of being human might be how some souls learn what to do—or not do—with modern technology, or our particular blend of sex and love, or whatever else it is that makes us human.
Because this world needs our help. Let’s face it—to a lot of folk in the magical and Otherkin subcultures, this place is in trouble. The environment is constantly under siege, millions of humans live in poverty-stricken, war-torn areas, disease is rampant and some days it just seems like the whole biosystem is about to collapse under the pressure. There are Otherkin who feel they came here with the purpose of alleviating some of the pain. There’s the theory that other sentient places in the Multiverse are well aware of us and want to try to help us, if for no other reason than to keep us from destroying everything around us. So souls come from these places in order to help out what is seen as a state of emergency. Take the concept of thinking globally, and expand it across the Multiverse. Predictably many of the Otherkin under this heading dedicate themselves to social, political, spiritual and related causes meant to make a positive impact.
Because we walked in. Walk-ins are a unique group among Otherkin; they’re not really so much a category as another explanation. A walk-in is a soul that enters a body well after birth. In some cases this happens at a point when the original soul abandons it (often at a time of great physical/emotional/etc. trauma, though this is not always the case). Other times the walk-in soul shares the body with the original soul. The souls involved may all have had nothing but human lives, but they show up in the `kin community commonly because it’s a safe haven for them to be open about who and what they are. Walk-ins may come in with a purpose, or simply with a curious desire to have a body again but not wanting or being able to enter a newborn body.
Oops. Species dysphoria does occasionally occur among Otherkin. This means that there are those who fully believe they were born into the completely wrong body. I’ve seen this most commonly among therianthropes—those who identify as nonhuman, Earth-native animals—but it happens in other groups as well. Stories vary as to why the soul ended up in the wrong body, ranging from “Well, I thought I was headed into a fox kit, but I guess I missed” to “I’m here against my will because of something I did in another life” (see the first theory listed above).
I dunno. You tell me. There are plenty of Otherkin who have absolutely no idea how they got here. While some do search for answers, many just shrug, chalk it up to unknown forces and go on with their lives.
Again, it’s entirely possible that we’re all just over-imaginative or even delusional; but then again, the same could arguably be said for anyone who claims to believe in reincarnation, spirits or magic. No doubt there are probably plenty who claim the Otherkin label who probably do need to do a lot more seeking before they come to this conclusion; after all, when you don’t feel you fit into this world, escapism can become an extreme behavior in a tiny fraction of individuals. Needless to say, there are thousands of people in this world who are Otherkin, who identify as such and who live perfectly functional, happy lives with no ill effects from their identities. The theory of reincarnation offers many of us a way to explain this feeling of being Other, so we can find peace with ourselves in our entirety.
Und von der gleichen Autorin noch mal:
Quelle: www.witchvox.com/va/dt_va.html?a=uswa&c=words&id=11030Otherkin and the Pagan Community
Author: Lupa
Posted: October 22nd. 2006
Times Viewed: 600
One of my favorite things about the pagan community is how diverse it is, and how much overlap there is with other subcultures. Back in December when my essay "I Am a Pagan Reject" [1] came out here in Witchvox, I got a ton of replies from people who agreed with me that diversity is healthy. I'll admit, of course, that we do get our share of fruit loops and flakes, but in my opinion that's a better alternative than screening potential pagans for acceptability based on a narrow set of standards.
One subculture that shares quite a bit of overlap with pagans are Otherkin. For those who don't know, Otherkin are people who, in some way, shape or form, identify as other than human. The Other may refer to an earthly animal, such as a wolf, bear or deer, a "mythical" being such as elves, dragons, or fey, or those who identify as vampires (though some vampires do not associate themselves with the Otherkin descriptor, which is another essay in and of itself) .
Now, pagans as a whole tend to be pretty tolerant. There's a marvelously low rate of racism and homophobia, though recent WV essays have detailed why some consider paganism to be intolerant towards men, some pagans still have issues accepting transgendered people, and there always seems to be unfortunate usage of pagan symbolism, such as certain white power groups appropriating Norse and Germanic symbolism for their own hateful agendas. But these are exceptions to the rule, in my experience. Pagan gatherings have a wide variety of people, from hippies to goths to rednecks to yuppies and many other groups and independent operators. It would seem that anything goes as long as no one gets hurt, and everybody's there to have a good time and be in a safe space, regardless of background.
Still, I've seen a number of threads on pagan-based listserves and online communities where a poster will mention being Otherkin, and almost immediately get dogpiled by a bunch of people ridiculing hir. Nobody asks "Well, why do you feel that way?" Rather, it's a sure flamefest. And it's not even limited to group venues. When I posted "The Reincarnation Theory of Otherkin" [2] here back in December, while most of the feedback was good, I did get one email from a rather disgruntled and sarcastic individual. I will say that this tends to be relatively rare, as most pagans I've met who are not Otherkin themselves are accepting at best, indifferent at worst. In addition, it seems that most of the negativity comes from the internet, not in-person meetings. People are a lot more aggressive to others online than in person.
This isn't to say we should accept anything and everything "just because". If someone walks up to you and says that s/he is the Highest Priest/ess of all and that all pagans ought to bow down and worship hir, you'd better be asking just what s/he's high *on*. And, for that matter, if someone says you have to have sex with hir to advance, or that initiation rites for pubertal children should be sexual in nature, run very quickly in the other direction. Most of us are used to weeding out the people who give us reason to be wary, and for some a person who believes s/he was an elf in a past life may be reason to look askance indeed!
However, what Otherkin believe is really no crazier than anything else metaphysical or magical in nature, once you get down to the nitty-gritty, and it doesn't involve anything meant to hurt others. I'd like to discuss some of the reasons why people may identify as Otherkin, and how they overlap with common pagan beliefs.
--Reincarnation: This is the most popular theory of Otherkin origin, though not universal. Most pagans believe in reincarnation in one form or another. Theories as to who/what can reincarnate vary; some people say that only humans go from one life to the next. However, others extend that to all animals, or all living beings, or even all spirits on all levels of existence. And, on a side note, most pagans do believe in Otherworldly spirits, such as faeries, dragons, and such--there are tons of books and articles about how to work with them, and their statues are popular altar adornments. Now, if any spirit can theoretically inhabit a physical body, why is it so hard to imagine that perhaps a dragon or an elf was born into the body of a human? (See "The Reincarnation Theory of Otherkin" for reasons why this might occur) . We believe, for the most part, in reincarnation, and in spirits, so is it really all that hard to put the two together?
--Psychological: There are a couple of manners in which psychology may be used to surmise the “cause” of Otherkin. If we explore Timothy Leary’s eight-circuit model of consciousness by way of Robert Anton Wilson’s “Prometheus Rising”, we find that the first and second circuits, the most primitive parts of our minds, are very animalistic in nature. Those who identify as animals in particular are of interest here. Our third circuit, the time-binding semantic circuit, is very human, and drives us to label and categorize things. [3] What’s to say that our third circuits can’t label and personify our first two circuits as an animal within us? On a different note, Jungian psychology has become an important part of modern paganism. We spend more time examining our beliefs not just from a spiritual viewpoint but also an analytical one. We explore the archetypes behind the beliefs, and sometimes seek to emulate their manifestations in the forms of gods and spirits as a way of worship or to create magic—hence the practice of invocation. What’s to say, though, that an invocation can’t be made permanent? If we have access to the entire collective unconscious (also known as, or at least similar to, the Akashic Record) , the sum total of the non-conscious mind-matter of all humans—or living beings—what’s to say we can’t connect with some portion of that on a daily basis and make it a part of our being? This brings us to the….
--Energetic: The energetic model of magic and spirit has gained popularity in recent years. Energy, in this model, is the force that creates magic—we shape and direct it to create a nonphysical means to our end. Our entire beings, in fact, are composed of energy at varying vibrational rates—or so the theory goes. However, Taylor Ellwood, in his forthcoming book “Inner Alchemy” (Immanion Press, Nov. 2006) , explains that every person possesses a unique energy signature, that everyone’s energy is different. Rather than being a fixed thing, he argues that not only is it mutable, but that we can willfully change it. It’s not an easy process, but he gives enough examples and backup for his claims that it’s quite possible. He further talks about how, with this principle of energetic fluidity, that we can alter the resonance of our energy signature to resemble the energy identified as “elven” or “draconic” on a permanent basis. This can be done through invoking the energy and then melding it with your own energy. [4] It is not a process done quickly, however, as it changes you on a very fundamental level. Just as you can’t make or break a habit overnight, so can you not drastically alter your energy signature in an instant, with the exception of massively traumatic events. (Incidentally, that trauma that occurs in hardcore initiatory rituals or shamanic death-rebirth rites not only suddenly shifts us psychologically, but also energetically.)
--Personal Mythological: I was first introduced to the concept of personal mythology through a bit of writing by CUSM on the Barbelith forums. [5] While what he talks about are the more extreme versions—people who believe they are destined to save the world—the concept of personal mythology can be more tempered. CUSM describes personal mythology as integral to some people’s magical selves—the aesthetic principle that helps us to slip out of “regular” consciousness/reality and, through make-believe and suspension of disbelief, into altered states of consciousness/reality. Many pagans are familiar with the subtle changes that occur when we don a specific robe, or cast the circle to create the “world between worlds”. However, what if that personal mythology entails identifying as something nonhuman—not just in ritual, but all the time? After all, many of us seek to live the magic 24/7, even if we are not constantly in rituals. But for many it is beneficial to bring the wonder and joy of magical ritual to our everyday lives, to blur the lines between mundane and magical. If it benefits someone personally and magically to identify as something other than human, and they're not interfering in the lives of others, where’s the harm in that?
While some Otherkin argue that one cannot *become* Otherkin, as no one has satisfactorily explained without a doubt what makes one Otherkin, and given that not all Otherkin come from the same origin, I’d say that the issue of born vs. made is still open to debate. It’s like the debate within the GLBT community—while many say you are born the way you are, there are enough people—me included—who have identified in a number of manners throughout our lives, and who have been genuine every time (ie, my time as a lesbian was no less real than my present pansexual identity) .
I explain my own situation through several of these theories. I find that being Wolf (which is something I’ve identified as in some form since I was about 2 or 3) not only helps me understand the workings of the first and second circuits referenced above by allowing me lupine symbolism to work with, but it also meshes quite nicely with the various forms of animal magic I’ve been studying and practicing for a decade. It is a part of my personal mythology, and it shapes the way I do my rituals and why I do them that way. I’m not a slave to it; it simply *is* who I am. However, if I wanted to bring another influence to myself, I could alter my energy over time. I don't personally believe that I was a wolf in a past life; the sensations and memories of being a wolf that I have had I tend to chalk up to gifts from the totemic Wolf, or things I have gleaned from the Collective Unconscious.
Admittedly, not all Otherkin present themselves in an entirely believable manner as far as most people are concerned. There are a lot of newcomers who haven't exactly been thorough in their self-searching before "coming out of the 'kin closet". So, just like pagans, Otherkin get a lot of newcomers with loud-n-proud growing pains. But as I have said before, this is no reason to discount them entirely. Give them a few years to grow up, and quit worrying about what the neighbors think. As far as those who just end up being permanent nuts and flakes, well, paganism has those, too. No room to criticize here. That’s normal for any group.
However, it is stressed over and over again in the community that if you believe yourself to be Otherkin, you need to search your self numerous times, question why you believe this or not, and not accept anything immediately—especially if it comes from anyone besides you. Most Otherkin who have been Awakened (aware of being ‘kin) have gone through the belief-doubt-belief cycle a number of times. Like pagans, we don’t accept something just because we think it sounds good—we research the subject. Rather than just looking through books, we look within ourselves as many pagans do, and, like pagans, we compare our experiences to those of others.
With that being said, the concept of Otherkin can still be a tough one to accept, even for pagans. However, as both communities grow, I believe it’s important to continue to foster the tolerance and acceptance that have made both communities dear to my heart. While not all Otherkin are pagan, a substantial number are, and as some of us come out of the 'kin closet to our non-Otherkin pagan friends, it's my hope that the pagan community will react with the same openness that welcomes other subcultures with ease. My goal with this article is to explain to non-Otherkin readers some of the ways that being Otherkin meshes with certain common beliefs and practices among pagans, as well as to give a basic introduction to those who may not be familiar with the Otherkin subculture.
Bin zu müde noch einen Kommentar zu schreiben
Ishtar
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
- Distelfliege
-
- Offline
- Fresh Boarder
-
- Beiträge: 26
- Dank erhalten: 0
Auf Hexen-online gibt es einen Thread namens "Otherkin" wo sich gleich eine Vielzahl von Usern als solche outen (Drachen, Elfen etc.)
Jäh, das geht in sehr vielen Foren so. Es gibt einen Thread oder jemand outet sich, und plötzlich outen sich gleich ganz viele. Ob Hexenbrett, Kondorforum oder sonst.
Ich glaub ich bin ein bissel neidisch auf Otherkin-Trittbrettfahrer, weil da behaupten Leuts von sich sie wären real ein Fantasywesen und kommen damit auch noch durch. Wenn bloss die eigenen moralischen Hemmschwellen nicht wären.. Mann, dann wär ich auch.. boah..
*g*
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
- Forum
- Götter, Wesen, Ahnen
- Götter, Ahnen, Naturgeister und andere Wesen.....
- Naturgeister und andere Wesen
- Otherkin? Therians?